The challenge:
​A collaborative responsible system with boundaries for a real society 

Some can argue that the market agree on certain price for each transaction/token, and its the responsibility of the buyer to follow through, but is important to foresee that most people using it does not understand the underlying commitments and consequences of their purchase/transaction. 

What are they transparenting? What are the risks, of sustaining the valued agreed on, really set/based on? How can the user be protected?

Business-wise, those and many more, are questions meant for all things beyond this technology, understanding what and who’s behind the business in a macro perspective helps to manage the risks and elaborate adequate procedures, and then its the responsibility of each party to agree, but without that, borderlines something else when we rely on a blockchain application as an almost universal system of communications/transactions. This is where and when the governance and profound education of this technology and the ones which claim to be its evolution  take mayor relevance.

And the top question that comes to mind, is born when we understand that its main added value, and what it stands for, is the main concern that raises: the management of it, and the level of corruption and risk it has as a whole. This is easily seen mainly within cryptocurrencies, when you realize the value of it is made just after one variable: demand. And the first one is seen when you understand it is a decentralized database, as in exchange as most of the internet today, that is hosted over specific company or government servers, or even your own private hard drives in your company computers.

The two most relevant subjects to be educating people about blockchain are opportunities and governance.
To understand the business opportunities we need to understand what is so special about a blockchain